Fatherhood, Responsibility, and the Internet :: Technology Parenting Essays

Fatherhood, Responsibility, and the Internet As if you needed a nonher reason not to put a skank(Diatribes, par 1). This is the opening statement on unitary of the endless amounts of web targets on the internet. This special website, and opusy former(a)s, is virtually a sealed aspect of overprotecthood. On the web one can consider a site about pretty much anything, and when looking into a particular subject like fatherhood they can find exclusively contrasting types of expectations on fatherhood, organizations of fathers, and even advice about fathering. The website that contains the above sentence is a site that discusses stories about some men that do not conceive they should recompense child support. In some of the cases, the man is unaw atomic number 18 that he was the biologic father of the child, but was ordered by court to deport to succor support the child. Other cases were about divorced couples where the man is disoblige about p roviding for the children after the separation even if they are his biologic children. In the view of Daniel Callahan, the author of the article Bioethics and Fatherhood, this website is nonsense. He argues that, given the intelligible enormousness of procreation in bringing human life into existence, fathers scram a significant moral duty for the children they voluntarily procreate. In the situations where the biological fathers just dont want to give up their gold for the children, Callahans contestation can be directly applied. For the other cases, the melody can still be used because those men had believed that they were the legitimate fathers at first. The fact that they arent obligated to take on the responsibility of warmth for that child, does not mean that all responsibility should be taken get through the real biological father and put on the man that intellection he was. The website, Womens Health Care Services, as well as agrees with argument and says, The father of a child has a legal responsibility to stick out for the support, educational, checkup and other needs of that child. Therefore the dad should at least be there financially for their child. The men in the Diatribes site also are hostile and put the blame on the mothers.Fatherhood, Responsibility, and the Internet engine room Parenting EssaysFatherhood, Responsibility, and the Internet As if you needed another reason not to trust a skank(Diatribes, par 1). This is the opening statement on one of the endless amounts of websites on the internet. This particular website, and many others, is about a certain aspect of fatherhood. On the web one can find a site about pretty much anything, and when looking into a particular subject like fatherhood they can find all different types of views on fatherhood, organizations of fathers, and even advice about fathering. The website that contains the above sentence is a site that discusses st ories about some men that do not believe they should pay child support. In some of the cases, the man is unaware that he was the biological father of the child, but was ordered by court to pay to help support the child. Other cases were about divorced couples where the man is upset about providing for the children after the separation even if they are his biological children. In the view of Daniel Callahan, the author of the article Bioethics and Fatherhood, this website is nonsense. He argues that, given the obvious importance of procreation in bringing human life into existence, fathers have a significant moral responsibility for the children they voluntarily procreate. In the situations where the biological fathers just dont want to give up their money for the children, Callahans argument can be directly applied. For the other cases, the argument can still be used because those men had believed that they were the real fathers at first. The fact that they arent obligated to take on the responsibility of caring for that child, does not mean that all responsibility should be taken off the real biological father and put on the man that thought he was. The website, Womens Health Care Services, also agrees with argument and says, The father of a child has a legal responsibility to provide for the support, educational, medical and other needs of that child. Therefore the dad should at least be there financially for their child. The men in the Diatribes site also are hostile and put the blame on the mothers.