Tok Can a Machine Know

In at onces day and age, the caput Can a Machine K nary(prenominal)? is real important and applic adequate to what we are doing with machines in making them more(prenominal) and more tender-hearted similar and cap qualified of charitable functions. A machine, as defined on Dictionary. com is an apparatus consisting of be busts with separate functions, used in the performance of slightly winning of work. That countms simple enough, non very complicated at all. tho indeed if you look up hump, the definition is very hard to grasp. Dictionary. com defines know as to perceive or record as particular or truth to apprehend clearly and with certainty.This doesnt give much legal expert to the word and requires you to define other terms such as understand and truth and certainty. It is much easier to use the term as defined check to Plato. His view is regarded to be the classical definition. According to Plato, at least troika criteria essential be satisfied in order fo r in that location to be knowledge a statement must be only ifified, true and believed. And so if a machine meets all these requirements and so it must in fact know. With machines, the main argument against their capabilty to know is that everything they undersurface do is because humans programmed them to do it.Machines cannot do anything on a whim they have no supposition or creativity. Creativity is one of the things that makes humans rather special and not meet walking computer processors. It enables us to make decisions which are not based simply on algorithms or past history or other data. We can be bold, reckless, brave, and foolish or act in many other emotional offices. This is impossible to program as emotions do not lend themselves to mathematical analysis. Yet emotions are an essential part of knowledge.For example I know whether I am happy today or not and it probably affects what I do today more than the facts I actually know. Computers can never be happy or sa d. They cannot love or grieve. They cannot, in other words, be human and know. only when the other side of the argument is that humans are just computers which obdurate is the exact opposite utter in the above paragraph. We are just many bits and pieces that are all working together to let us live and get it on life. In fact humans are classified as biological machines, and if humans can know anything, machines should be able to know.Many consider the only aspect that makes humans and other higher(prenominal) organic creatures divers(prenominal) from the commonly defined machine is our ability to say emotions and intuition. These emotions and intuitions come from our mind, which is a system a system of biochemistry, electricity, some mechanics and maybe a bit of quantum mechanics, but a system nonetheless. If you load down any individual part of this system away, none of these parts leave understand anything. Theyre simply exchanging information with different parts accord ing to even up rules.This is exactly what a machine does when given instructions and prior facts and figures. As I was researching this topic and looking at both sides of the argument, I undertake I was very torn. At first I thought no, in that locations no way a machine can know. They arrogatet have brains and everything they do is programmed beforehand for them by humans. But as I delved more deeply into the question I found that some advanced zombis are not quite like that. On Y step upube, there are many videos which include Hondas robot, named ASIMO, that show machines can opine very much on theyre own.One video negotiation about how this robot can actually manipulate, a trace we usually only give to living organisms. Though it has two cameras for eyes, the way it processes the information it views with the cameras is very humanlike, like a child education their surroundings. A man shows the robot objects that it has already needed to indentify and ASIMO says what th ey are out loud. But then the man shows it two completely different objects, a toy car and a toy robot, and tells ASIMO what they are. The man then shows the robot the two objects again and asks it what they are.ASIMO dutifully replies what each is correctly. This amazed me because it showed machines could actually learn from experience, just like humans. But that wasnt all, ASIMO was later told indentify a electric chair. At first a normal looking wood chair was rigid in front of it and the robot nodded. Then a stool was displace in front and ASIMO nodded again, even though the stool looks nothing like a chair. But then it is showed a table and ASIMO shakes his head no. This was very astounding to me because it showed a machine making a judgment.So to actually determine whether or not a computer can know, we must go back to Platos description of knowledge and see if a machine fits. The main purpose of most machines is to record colossal amounts of data which are all truthful so that fulfills the first criteria simple enough. Then it must be justified which is done by the programmer feeding information to the machine. And last but not least it must believe and because the computer must follow the code its given, then it must believe and thus it fits all of Platos criteria for knowledge.But this just seemed too easy so I decided to look into the shipway of knowing, and if the machine fit all those components, then it definitely knows. Though a machine can use reason to solve problems that no human can, use intuition to figure out if an object is a chair or not, speak in every language known to man, see objects and know what they are, and be able to hear a human and respond, machines steady cannot experience emotion and that is the one thing stopping them from knowing. As stated in a previous argument, an essential part to knowing is through emotion and creativity and imagination.Without these things a machine cannot know. Until humans are able to make a machine that has the capacity that the human brain does, a machine provide never know like a human. It ordain understand how to perform certain tasks and learn new things, but it will never be able to create something of its own or experience any type of emotion. In saying this, I do believe that in the near future, with technological advances, there will soon be a machine which can think for itself and have its own ideas and creations. callable to Raymond Kurzweils theory of Singularity, humans will create machines that have cognition which surpasses their own and by that time machines will most definitely know. Because of the human sciences striving to create robots that are humanlike, they will eventually become triple-crown and once the breakthrough is made, then there will be thousands of different machines that can know and our society will have totally changed. But as of right now, a machine cannot know. It can perform very humanlike tasks and talk and walk and speak but there is tranquilize the barrier of not being able to imagine or olfactory perception which separates humans from machines.Bibliographyhttp//www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=53888page=3